Robert Downey Jr’s tipping point as a box office draw, I think, was 2005’s Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. The potential was always there, admittedly: take Air America, for instance, or his Oscar-nominated turn in Chaplin. But it took the Shane Black written and directed black comedy of errors to confirm that Downey is at his most reliable and entertaining when playing to his strengths: cocky, charming, droll, deadpan and just that little bit out on the edge. Most of his films since have worked on a variant of this theme, which makes sense. Once you’ve found the winning formula, it makes no sense to go out your way to ruin it…
Downey and Black reunite for Iron Man 3, the first of this summer’s run of multiplex-fillers. We last saw Iron Man in last year’s The Avengers, narrowly escaping death from hurtling to earth after some complicated shenanigans. These things sit heavily on men and even supermen, as we discover. The Tony Stark that we meet at the beginning of Iron Man 3 is a multi-millionaire in search of his lost mojo. Most men in this position will simply sulk in the basement, or make a nuisance of themselves to their nearest and dearest. In this case, we instead have Downey’s Stark tinkering with the latest iteration of his best known creation – Iron Man Mk 42, since you ask – and driving his girlfriend and CEO of Stark Industries, Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) to distraction.
Meanwhile, the United States is grappling with the threat posed by the Mandarin, a very post-modern terrorist, with very pre-modern methods: rebranding Iron Man’s old comrade in arms, War Machine (Don Cheadle), as the Iron Patriot (Don Cheadle), and hoping for the best. Red, White and Blue armour always does the trick. (I should say at this point that whilst it is perfectly possible to watch and enjoy Iron Man III without prior knowledge, a vague awareness of the franchise’s back story helps a little.) Lingering all the while is the oleaginous Aldrich Killian (Guy Pearce), whose Advanced Ideas Mechanics wants to coax Stark Industries into collaborating on Extremis – an advanced, experimental regenerative treatment very useful for people recovering from critical injuries. Soldiers, for instance.
The success of the Iron Man franchise rests squarely on Downey’s tin shoulders: for this reason, the rather fantastical underpinnings of Iron Man III never trouble so long as Downey is left to his own devices. Support acting is largely anonymous, Ben Kingsley’s delightfully self mocking turn as a failed English actor turned global terrorist aside. Special effects, as always, are spectacular without quite becoming overwhelming. Efficiency is the order of the day: not quite with Iron Man himself though, whose technical lapses force ol’ Tin-Head out of his shell and into relying on his own ingenuity for a good chunk of the film.
Iron Man 3 works well, I think, for two reasons. First, after the extra-terrestrial distractions of The Avengers (assuming, for a moment, that it is reasonable to describe Norse Gods thus), the film returns Stark to a recognisable scenario that never particularly stretches credulity.
(Right. So the notion of a guy in a tin suit who routinely saves humanity from itself three times a week, and gets to have dinner with Gwyneth Paltrow doesn’t stretch credulity? Fair point.)
Beyond this, Black’s script is sharp and genuinely funny. The occasional sleights-of-hand strive valiantly to distract from narrative gaps, the film as a whole has a compactness and cohesiveness that The Avengers, in particular, lacked. And it is helpful to think about the two films alongside one another: The Avengers, to my mind, dragged on a bit because there were two many radioactively-charged cooks to spoil the broth. With Iron Man 3, we have Downey/Stark all to ourselves. There isn’t any better way to have it.
I haven’t seen the movie, but I’ve read the comics so I have a general picture of how things shape up.
Also, its hard to say that its possible to spoil a superhero movie. Bad things happen, good guys win (and get the girl) lets eat (shwarma).
In any case: I love the pictures that accompanied the article (and since this is the first? article that I’ve ever commented on, good job!)
Having said that, I get the impression that you weren’t so fond of the movie since you stuck to the narrative without lingering on the details. I’d love to see another Iron Man III review from you where you tell it like it is – say what you liked most and hated about it, how it worked and what made it as awesome (or not) as it was. I suppose we’ll have to wait until enough people have seen it for that.
I liked your comparison to Avengers” because I felt the same way – It tried to do too much. I’m looking forward to Iron Man a lot more now that I hear that it has the right mix of attention Tony deserves.
Hi Amir,
Thanks for reading and responding.
I see the point you make about sci-Fi and fantasy, and in a way I agree. (I’m looking forward to watching both Elysium and Oblivion for this very reason). But – for good or for bad – the Iron Man franchise is first and foremost entertainment, a summer seat-filler and popcorn seller. I think it is only fair to review it in this context, especially since it doesn’t pretend to aspire to anything higher. Yes, there are holes in the plot which become evident once you think about it a bit carefully. But i guess my test for the film is this: does it engage, or does one’s attention wander? I think very much the former, and I think this is mainly down to Robert Downey Jr, which is why I concentrate on him in the review.
I think you’ll agree that there are any number of sci-fi and fantasy films that fail even this test…
As for The Mandarin: Without saying too much either, do I *really* give away the story? I don’t think I do. But I can’t argue the point without spoiling anything, either 🙂 (or spoiling things even further)
All the best,
Akin
NERD RAGE! – The best thing I can say about Mr Ajayi’s review is that he, definitely, saw the movie… with most of the rest I, respectfully, disagree. Putting aside the fact that he saw fit to give away one of the movie’s biggest spoilers away without warning, he somehow managed to look past the plot chasms and cop outs and focus on the humor and Mr Downey jr’s apt portrail of Tony Stark (and both were good). Fantasy/Science fiction is a tricky subject to do well, especially these days with the lure of flashy visuals. It just puts into sharper contrast how weak, or strong the plot is… this movie, in my personal opinion, failed to deliver exactly because it becomes so obvious that you are SUPPOSED to look past the predictability of the story or how uninvolved it leavs you, the viewer … Except for the Mandarin’s tale whose secret Mr Ajayi failed to keep.
Ironically at this point, but – IN SHORT, while it is a very cool and amusing movie, it feels like a missed opportunity of what it could have been and that parts of the plot and the design are uninspired, borderline lazy.
And this is the best I can give you without spoiling anything.
Comments are closed.